A South African Indian lecturer at an institute here has been accused of showing female students pornographic videos 

Business Ethics

A South African Indian lecturer at an institute here has been accused of showing female students pornographic videos 

Case Studies

CASE STUDY (20 Marks)

Durban: A South African Indian lecturer at an institute here has been accused of showing female students pornographic videos. Mohil Ramgovindji is facing a disciplinary inquiry for alleged sexual misconduct after he reportedly told students the films were part of the curriculum. He also claimed he was “preparing them for the harsh realities of the hospitality industry that they were training for.” Ramgovindji is working at the Durban Institute of Technology. He lectures at the hotel school on the ML Sultan campus of the institute. The allegations surfaced when female students fearing intimidation or embarrassment approached South African Democratic Student movement (Sadesmo), which demanded that Ramgovindji be suspended with immediate effect. An angry Sadesmo spokesperson, Sihle Nsindane, told the weekly Independent here: “At stake is the future of students who are victimized by people old enough to be their fathers.” The boys and girls in our groups were segregated, but when I walked into the room allocated to me, I found Ramgovindji watching a pornographic movie with female students. There was also alcohol freely available.”

 

Answer the following question.

 

Q1. Discuss the moral and ethical issues w.r.t. above case.

 

Q2. What are your view points on the above case?

CASE STUDY (20 Marks)

Shareholder activism has its roots in hostile takeover bids of the 1980s, when corporate raiders were viewed negatively by the media and shareholders. By the 1990s, thinking about the best structure for companies was shifting to reflect the idea that shareholders

should have more of a say over companies’ destinies. Today, the activists are massive corporations in their own right. Today, it is often the case that activist funds are worth more than the companies they are targeting. The amount of capital available to shareholder activists has gone up dramatically, including from asset classes with a lot of money, such as pension funds. Institutional investors are working with activists at an increasing rate. The campaigns are comprehensive. Activist shareholders now hire investment banks and the best law firms, outpacing the resources individual companies apply to the same analysis. The current wave of change is focused on boards. Shareholders want someone who is an investor on the board. It’s becoming best practice to welcome someone with investing experience onto the board, in part to benefit from their perspective but also to preempt activist demands for an investor to join the board. “A lot of people defer to ISS.” (ISS is the largest of the activist proxy advisory firms) “A big concern is that companies and activists are fundamentally operating from the perspective of a different timeframe.” “We like to build value over a long period of time – to invest in a technology that may not have a payoff for 10 years, or to invest in research and development.” “Typically the entry point for activists is sloppy corporate governance.” “I see a lot of really good people that don’t want to be on boards anymore.” How that so-called big data is providing access to information that would not previously have been discovered, what are the ethical boundaries around companies’ use of this data? A panel of experts discussed “Ethical Use of Collected Data” as part of the Business and Organizational Ethics Partnership at Santa Clara University’s Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. The panelists included Shannon Vallor, associate professor of philosophy at Santa Clara University; Scott Shipman, general counsel and chief privacy officer at Sensity Systems; and MeMe Jacobs Rasmussen, chief privacy officer at Adobe Systems. The panel was moderated by Irina Raicu, director of Internet ethics at the Ethics Center. Vallor opened the discussion with an explanation of how big data is used and some of the ethical issues it raises. “The applications are virtually boundless, given that consumers are generating and we are collecting and storing unprecedented volumes of data in all sectors: private, public, heath care, education, commerce and entertainment,” Vallor said. “We are being overwhelmed by the promise of big data to solve persistent challenges in public health, criminal justice” and other areas. But there are risks as well as benefits to using big data. Privacy is one of the biggest issues, given the volume of data that is being collected. Consumers are justifiably concerned not only about what the company that collects the data will do with it, but also how it will be protected from third parties. The ethical issues go well beyond privacy, Vallor said. “It’s easy to lose sight of that because privacy is so significant and challenging.” For example, does big data offer a fair distribution of both risks and benefits? Will it exacerbate the digital divide, with consumer needs and desires being determined based on what those who own digital devices want? Accuracy and reliability are also issues, especially when institutions decide to make important decisions based on the data. “The principle of garbage in, garbage out applies to big databases as well as small databases,” Vallor said. Finally, Vallor said, big data could be used to discriminate, with “analytics as a quick and dirty form of redlining.” Certain types of people could be classified as poor risks for employment, health care interventions, or educational services, for example. Rasmussen, who works closely with Adobe’s digital marketing business, pointed to both risks and benefits of big data when describing her job. “We do collect a lot of data, but we retain very limited rights to use that data,” she said. “My team works with the business units to understand what they are doing with the data and to advise them on how to develop the products in a way that is privacy-focused.” However, Adobe requests permission to aggregate data from its customers, providing information that would not be otherwise available, such as how many PCs, tablets and mobile devices are accessing websites. Adobe tries to follow the dictum, “Say what you do, do what you say, and don’t surprise the user,” Rasmussen said. “’Don’t surprise the user’ sounded really good to me when I first started in this job. But I’ve learned over the years that transparency is hard when you’ve got complicated products. Figuring out whether what you’re doing will surprise the user is often difficult.” “We might draft a privacy policy that says we collect XX and do YY,” Rasmussen said. “Right after you publish it, the product team may come to you and say, ‘Can we do ZZ as well?’ You don’t want to stop innovation, but you can’t just keep revising your privacy policy.” Shipman, too, has a job that illustrates both the promise and the risks of using big data. Sensivity is an Internet of Things company, capitalizing on the transition to LED lighting to create Light Sensory Networks that will allow cities and other entities to deliver both energy-efficient lighting and a real-time, global database of information that allows customers to manage and understand their physical environment for greater productivity, efficiency and security. He was hired as chief privacy officer to build and govern a global privacy program, in which he will establish data protection standards and lead industry-wide privacy initiatives. One of the issues, Shipman said, is defining the audience. For companies like his, the customers — those who purchase the product — are not the only ones affected by it. “To improve operations and efficiency of a city, for example, it’s important to understand how city assets are used – roads, parking spots, utilities, etc. This means collecting data on behalf of our customer – the city – from the end user who is not our customer. Often it’s the non-customer that is misinformed,” he said. “You have to keep those perceptions in mind as well.” One challenge is that it’s difficult for everyone involved to envision either the benefits or the harms inherent in a use of big data, Shipman said. “Consumers expect companies to innovate. Seeking permission for every benefit would restrict innovation and limit the benefits.” One question from the audience centered around whether consumers are actually as concerned about privacy as they say they are, given that they often don’t bother to use encryption. Raicu said studies have shown people give up less data once they know what’s being collected, which suggests they do value privacy. And Vallor said her students are increasingly using apps like Snapchat, which they view as protecting their privacy. “It’s not true that people either protect themselves from all harm or don’t care about harm,” Vallor said. “The fact that there are people out there who are knowingly allowing their data to be collected doesn’t mean that those people expect to be harmed and aren’t going to be outraged when they are.” On the other hand, Rasmussen said, some people are less concerned the more they learn about how data is collected and used. They may prefer to see ads that are relevant to them, for

example, even though it means their online behavior is being tracked. Vallor noted that predicting people’s responses will never be fully accurate. As a strategy, not surprising the user “has got its limitations, and then there has to be another strategy: How do we manage the situation when the user is surprised – or when we’re surprised?” And Raicu noted that there could be a “chilling effect if people are discouraged from using technology because of privacy concerns.”

 

Answer the following question.

 

Q1. Debate the dictum, “Say what you do, do what you say, and don’t surprise the user”, in relation to the ethical use of the big data being collected by the companies.

 

CASE STUDY (20 Marks)

New Delhi: The next time you happen to pass by a sugarcane field, ask yourself how difficult it f might be to spray pesticides to maximum effect there. It would be difficult even to enter the field, leave alone get at the pests. And that is just one of the problems in pesticide use and abuse. Chew on this official figure: Nearly 90 percent of pesticides never hit the pests they are meant to, and end u contaminating air, soil and water – eventually entering the food chain as a slow poison. What makes this worse is that over 80 percent of all pesticides are used in growing cotton, rice, vegetables and fruits covering just a third of the cropped area. Many of these pesticides compounds remain in the soil, building up to toxic levels with respect use – particularly in soils with low organic matter and microbial biodiversity. India Council of Agricultural Research scientists, Deputy Director – General J. S. Samra and Assistant Director –General (soils) P.D. Sharma, say this is dangerous: daily intake of even small quantities of these residues with food may be hazardous in the long run, leading to cancer; reduced life span and fertility, increased cholesterol and many metabolic and genetic disorders. The strange bit is that pesticide use has actually been coming down since 1990, from 60,000 metric tons of technical grade material to about 43,000 metric tons in 2001. Pesticide use in India is low, about 0.45 per kg a hectare, compared to figures of 1-12 kg/ hectare for countries such as the US, Korea and Japan. However this hasn’t minimized our troubles. Scientists point to “widespread contamination” of soil, water and food. Samra and Sharma cite figures indicating that more than half of all food items are contaminated, up to 20 percent with residues crossing maximum permissible limits. “Pests present small targets and application efficiency is low,” says Sharma. His colleague, Assistant Director General (plant protection) O.P Dubey, describes a range of problems: ignorant farmers, small holdings which allow pests to migrate from one field which is spread to another which is not, cheap spurious chemicals and scant work on pesticide application technology. “We are slowly realizing the problem of spraying systems and are making changes,” he says. Solutions are possible through “the right dose, right quantity and right spirit.” Bur there are many ifs and buts. Dubey gives an example: In some cases, vegetables from fields have had residues just five percent above the limit, this figure mysteriously climbing to 60 percent by the time these reach the market.

Answer the following question.

 

Q1. Give an overview of the case.

 

Q2. What are the remedies available for the above case? Explain.

 

CASE STUDY (20 Marks)

An experienced and knowledgeable Indian tourist guide suggested to a foreign tourist whom he was guiding that it would better to give up the program of going around the places in the city and instead visit a plush five star hotel whose nightclub featured a good cabaret. The guide, further, said that he would explain his life story which could give a clear picture of poverty in India.

Answer the following question.

 

Q1. Explain the unethical issues in this case.

 

Q2. Give an overview of the case

 

Image result for Business Ethics

  • Assignment Help

  • Case study help

  • Project Report

  • Report Writing

  • Homework

  • Essay writing and editing

  • Dissertation writing

  • Thesis writing & editing

  • Academic writing

Dr.ARAVIND BANAKAR

aravind.banakar@gmail.com

https://www.mbacasestudyanswers.com

09901366442 – 09902787224

 

Share Button