KSBM – Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based echnology

Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based echnology

Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based echnology


Assignment Solutions, Case study Answer sheets

Project Report and Thesis contact



ARAVIND – 09901366442 – 09902787224


General Management

CASE 4:  Transforming Reuters

London-based Reuters is a venerable company. Established in 1850 and devoted to delivering information around the world by the fastest means available–which in 1850 meant a fleet of 45 carrier pigeons–by the late 1990s the company had developed into one of the largest providers of information in the world. Although Reuters is known best to the public for  its  independent,  unbiased  news  reporting,  90  percent  of  Reuters’  revenues  are generated  by  providing  information  to  traders  in  financial  markets.  In  the  1990s  the company used a proprietary computer system and a dedicated telecommunications network to deliver real-time quotes and financial information to Reuters terminals–devices that any self-respecting  financial  trader  could  not  function  without.  When  Reuters  entered  the financial data business in the early 1970s it had 2,400 employees, most of them journalists. By the late 1990s its employee base had swelled to 19,000, most of whom were on the financial and technical side. During this period of heady growth Reuters amassed some.

1,000 products often through acquisitions, such as foreign-language data services, many of which used diverse and sometimes incompatible computer delivery systems.

The late 1990s were the high point for Reuters. Two shocks to Reuters’ business put the company in a tailspin. First came the Internet, which allowed newer companies, such as Thompson Financial Services and Bloomberg, to provide real-time financial information to any computer with an Internet connection. Suddenly Reuters was losing customers to a cheaper and increasingly ubiquitous alternative. The Internet was commoditizing the asset on which Reuters had built its business: information. Then in 2001 the stock market bubble of the 1990s finally broke; thousands of people in financial services lost their jobs; and Reuters lost 18 percent of its contracts for terminals in a single year. Suddenly a company that had always been profitable was losing money.

In 2001 Reuters appointed Tom Glocer as CEO. The first nonjournalist CEO in the company’s history, Glocer, an American in a British-dominated firm, was described as “not part of the old boys’ network.” Glocer had long advocated that Reuters move to an Internet-based delivery system. In 2000 he was put in charge of rolling out such a system across Reuters but met significant resistance. The old proprietary system had worked well, and until 2001 it had been extremely profitable. Many managers were therefore reluctant to move toward a Web- based system that commoditized information and had lower profit margins. They were worried about product cannibalization. Glocer’s message was that if the company didn’t roll out a Web-based system, Reuters’ customers would defect in droves. In 2001 his prediction seemed to be coming true.

Once in charge, Glocer again pushed an Internet-based system, but he quickly recognized that Reuters’ problems ran deeper. In 2002 the company registered its first annual loss in history, $480 million, and Glocer described the business as ‘’fighting for survival.’’ Realizing that dramatic action was needed, in February 2003 Glocer launched a three-year strategic and organizational transformation program called Fast Forward. It was designed to return Reuters to profitability by streamlining its product offering, prioritizing what the company focused on, and changing its culture. The first part of the program was an announcement that 3,000 employees (nearly 20 percent of the workforce) would be Iaid off.

To change its culture Reuters added an element to its Fast Forward program known as “Living Fast,” which defined key values such as passionate and urgent working, accountability, and commitment to customer service and team. A two-day conference of 140 managers, selected for their positions of influence and business understanding rather than their seniority, launched the program. At the end of the two days the managers collectively pledged to buy half a million shares in the company, which at the time were trading at an all- time low.

After the conference the managers were fired up; but going back to their regular jobs, they found  it  difficult  to  convey  that  sense  of  urgency,  confidence,  and  passion  to  their employees. This led to the development of a follow-up conference: a one-day event that included all company employees. Following a video message from Glocer and a brief summary of the day in 1,300 cross-functional groups addressing challenges outlined by Glocer and proposing concrete solutions. Each group chose one of “Tom’s challenges” to address. Many employee groups came up with ideas that could be rapidly implemented- and were. More generally, the employees asked for greater clarity in product offerings, less bureaucracy, and more accountability. With this mandate managers launched a program to rationalize the product line and streamline the company’s management structure. In 2003 the company had 1,300 products. By 2005 Reuters was focusing on Web. The early results of these changes were encouraging. By the end of 2004 the company recorded a £380 million profit, and the stock price had more than doubled.


  1. What technological paradigm shift did Reuters face in the 1990s? How did that paradigm shift change the competitive playing field?

  1. Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based  echnology?

  1. Why do you think Tom Glocer was picked as CEO? What assets did he bring to the leadership job?

  1. What do you think of Glocer’s attempts to change the strategy and organizational culture at Reuters? Was he on the right track? Would you do things differently?

Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based echnology

Why was Reuters slow to adopt Internet-based echnology

Our Key Services

Assignment Help

Case study help

Report Writing

Homework / Assessment help

Essay writing and editing

Project Report

Dissertation writing

Thesis writing & editing

Professional report writing

Academic writing

Coursework Writing

Research paper writing





09901366442 – 09902787224

Share Button